Eritrea’s government should not be allowed to harm peace in Ethiopia

 


President Isaias Afwerki’s determination to continue his feud with the TPLF is jeopardising stability in Ethiopia and the wider region.

On November 3, 2020, a long-simmering political confrontation between the federal government of Ethiopia and the Tigray regional state, governed by the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF), broke out. Early on in the conflict, neighboring Eritrea sent troops to Tigray to support the federal administration.

 

The Ethiopian government and the TPLF came to an agreement on a "permanent cessation of hostilities" on November 3, 2022, exactly two years later. This agreement effectively put an end to the civil war, which by that point had already claimed thousands of lives, uprooted millions of people, and forced many more to the verge of starvation.

 

Nonetheless, the Eritrean government continued to provoke the TPLF while refusing to remove its forces from Tigray, where they are alleged to have violated a number of human rights. Residents of Tigray charged that long after the ceasefire, Eritrean forces had continued to kill, arrest, and pillage civilians. The Eritrean government has also been charged with giving financial, military, and logistical assistance to Amhara regional state armed organizations that are still present in Tigray and are also claimed to be engaged in violent and illegal operations in other regions of Ethiopia.

 

 

Eritrean military are still in Tigray nearly six months after the cease-fire agreement, and there are growing worries that Asmara's actions could sabotage Ethiopia's critical peace process and plunge the nation and the surrounding area back into conflict.

 

Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki says he is determined to continue his country’s decades-old conflict with the TPLF, which was in control of Ethiopia during Eritrea’s 30-year independence war against the country.

 

He, however, does not appear to be pursuing a prolonged conflict with the leadership of the regional state solely to settle historical grievances.

 

In an interview published by the Eritrean Ministry of Information in February, Afwerki accused the TPLF of being mercenaries working to maintain Western hegemony in the Horn of Africa. The Tigray war, he claimed “was not really a TPLF agenda; but essentially the agenda of Washington”. It was a result of the TPLF’s willingness to serve as a foot soldier in Washington’s quest to facilitate a return to the “unipolar world order”, he argued.

 

He pointed to the invasion of Ukraine as an example of the US-led struggle to maintain a unipolar world, and claimed the US uses “proxies, such as the TPLF clique and others, to create chaos everywhere”.

 

All in all, it is obvious that Afwerki believes in Tigray his troops helped the Ethiopian government defeat not only a rebellious regional administration but a plot to alter the world order to the detriment of Eritrean and African sovereignty.

 

This suggests Afwerki will continue to agitate for further conflict with the TPLF even if the group adheres to all the conditions of the agreement for the cessation of hostilities and agrees to respect the authority of the Ethiopian federal government.

 

This perspective, which portrays the TPLF as an American puppet who is innately opposed to regional powers, could prove damaging for all Ethiopians, Eritreans, and Africans as well as the Tigrayan people for a number of reasons.

 

 

First and foremost, the international community's efforts to create a lasting peace architecture in Tigray could be harmed by the Eritrean government's insistence on maintaining its soldiers there and support for Amhara groups, which has the potential to ignite a new conflict in Ethiopia.

 

 

With the numerous allegations of war crimes and violations of human rights made against Eritrean soldiers, their continuing presence in Ethiopia could pave the way for additional atrocities and prevent Tigrayans from rebuilding their lives.

 

Furthermore, the Eritrean government’s continued involvement in Ethiopian conflicts could negatively affect the wellbeing of the many Eritrean refugees currently residing in Ethiopia.

 

Before the recent conflict, about 100,000 Eritrean refugees lived in camps in Tigray. For a long time, they were safe in Ethiopia. But when the war erupted, these refugees and other Eritrean civilians in the regional state found themselves being targeted by all warring parties, including Eritrean forces. They have been subjected to siege tactics, deprived of any kind of aid for long periods of time, and fallen victim to targeted attacks. Reportedly, some were also forcibly returned to Eritrea in violation of the principle of non-refoulement. The Eritrean government’s refusal to leave Tigray and allow Ethiopians to resolve the conflict between themselves means that remaining Eritrean refugees in the regional state are still under threat.

 

The Eritrean government’s continued involvement in the Tigray conflict could also have grave consequences well beyond Ethiopia’s borders. Ethiopia is a key player in the Horn of Africa, and its stability is crucial to maintaining peace and security in the region. The continued involvement of the Eritrean government in Ethiopian conflicts, and President Afwerki’s efforts to provoke the TPLF, could exacerbate tensions and contribute to instability in the region.

 

To avoid this grim scenario, the international community should closely monitor the situation in Tigray and take the necessary steps to ensure Afwerki’s government is not given further opportunities to destabilise Ethiopia. This includes pressuring the Eritrean government in every way possible to pull its troops out of Ethiopia, holding it accountable for the atrocities it is alleged to have committed in Tigray, and encouraging the Ethiopian federal government to take a firm stance against Eritrea’s involvement in its domestic affairs.

 

In addition, the Ethiopian authorities and the TPLF should be encouraged to build on the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement and expand its scope to include other Ethiopian rebel groups, such as the Oromo Liberation Army, to provide sustainable and inclusive solutions to current security, social, political and economic challenges in Ethiopia.

 

After two years of civil war, the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement put Ethiopia on the path towards sustainable peace and long-term stability. The global community should do everything in its power to stop the Eritrean government from undoing this achievement.


By Samuel Zewdie Hagos via Aljazeera

 


Agelgl Media websites:

Agelgl Life

Agelgl Amharic

 


Post a Comment

0 Comments